Comparison of Sophocles' and Euripides' portrayal of humanity. Sophocles' is said to have portrayed men as they ought to be, while Euripides is said to have portrayed men "as they are"

The vast poet Aristotle once say that Sophocles ? set hu worldspower as they ought to be while Euripides portrayed men as they authentically are.? It can be argued that Sophocles did non portray an idealized edition of man because his works did incur two an antagonist and a protagonist, simply even the antagonists in Sophocles? plays were scrupulous. Furthermore, the manner in which Euripides portrays the characters in his plays adheres to a level of psychology unprecedented in his time, and then portraying men ?as they really are.?For example, during the scholarship plan in Euripides? play Electra, the recognition scene in Aeschylus? interpreting of the myth is parodied as Euripides uses Electra to articulate the incredibility of the ?signs? used in the Libation Bearers, which is much more inherent of what some unrivalled in Electra?s position would do. quite, she recognizes Orestes when the superannuated man points come in a incision on his head. Here Euripides uses naive realism which is very typical of his bm throughout many of his works. Sophocles on the some other hand portrays the characters in his plays as men of principle. For cause in Oedipus the King, Oedipus is portrayed as a sympathetic formula and a doer of dandy deeds. However, Oedipus ultimately turns out to be a sinner and the substructure of the plague in Thebes. other example of the high impertinent standards of Sophocles? characters is Oedipus? insistence on having the old man speak in front of every bingle instead of ? retentiveness quiet? as he deficiencyed (Oedpius Rex 1372) and this is representative of the opinion that noble men wipe out nothing and keep everything out in the open. When he enjoy his sins were the source of the plague in Thebes, Oedipus gouged his own eyes; a more vivid Oedipus would put up up simply left the urban center in exile, but Sophocles? ideal tragic mill essential rise higher up and beyond what the common man would do. Another example of Eurpides? realism is in his play the Phrygian Slave, when Orestes went from fitting the enwrapped to the captor, and was in hold firm of the slave?s fate. Instead of treating him kindly, Orestes be endured in a uncivilised manner to contendd the slave, threatening to polish him. This is typical psychology of champion who was once helplessly in the control of others and suddenly finds himself in control of the fate of some other psyche. sophisticated psychologists call this phenomenon ? character coke psychology? and the offspring it has on each person is different depending on how they wait the new grasped power. Sophocles also subjects one of the main characters of his play to this usage reversal effect, but as expected, the results differ greatly from what Euripides has shown in his play. Oedipus at Colonus is a lengthiness of the story of the house of Oedipus in which Oedipus seeks safe in Athens, and two of his sons seek his support to produce the war for control of Thebes.

Although Oedipus rejects both of his sons out of anger, he does it because the Thebans as a whole have outcasted him. Also, when he complains to Polyneices of all that he has been make to suffer because of his exile, he ends his list of complaints by verbal expression ?I may not weep, I must put up with it? (Oedipus at Colonus 1554), thus portraying Oedipus as a worshipful man who has recognized the will of the gods. Furthermore, Creon kidnaps the daughters of Oedipus in an sweat to burden him to help Eteocles win. However, a real human being, one who feels anger, would have sided with Polyneices to help establish about the downfall of the Thebans as avenge for outcasting him as intumesce as for kidnapping his daughters. consequently the men portrayed in Sophocles? plays are not ones who notch among us, but are of a mythical sort to be told in plays and other much(prenominal) tales, whereas Euripides takes what he sees in solar day to day life and uses his characters as a tool to represent this realistic portrait of humanity. Although Sophocles? characters aren?t completely unrealistic, their ability to be extra-considerate of those or so them is an blowup typical of his dramas, especially when contrasted with the stagger realism of Euripides? characters. flora Cited:http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Role_reversal If you want to get a blanket(a) essay, shape it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.