The effect of violence in media on society, this is the title and basicly what it is about.

Is societies violence the medias fault? This is the question that has been asked since before television was in every Americans house. Of course in that respect are the different types of media instantly ranging from newspapers, to on-line reports and stories. There check been arguments upon arguments about this issue, and over 3,000 studies conducted. alas there isnt wizard single result, there is only an army of supposed answers to this undying question.

CBS president, Howard Stringer is pointing to a different scapegoat for societys violence. I come from a country that puts a galvanic pile of American movies on and has more graphic violence within its get drama on the BBC than anywhere else, and there is a lot less violence in the United Kingdom than there is here. There are 200 million guns in America, and that has a lot to do with violence. He feels it has to do with gun control, which others have suggested. But there are so galore(postnominal) bowelless acts, that one cant focus on the guns, just like one cant focus on the media. David Phillips, one of the men we discuss after put it perfectly, Its like watching rain fall on a pond and trying to figure out which fire causes which ripple.

There have been many studies conducted on the effects of violence on children, and on the effects on society as a whole.



There have been about 3,000 studies performed on this topic. Two of the near prolific studies were the UCLA Television Violence Monitoring Report, and the Mediascope, Inc. test sponsored by the National Cable Television Association. Of course there were many other studies done, but these made headlines because of their results.

The UCLA study focused on all of the television media, and discovered some interesting facts from their study.

If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.