Monday, April 1, 2013

Griswold v. Connecticut

GRISWOLD ET AL. v. CONNECTICUT

No. 496

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

381 U.S. 479; 85 S. Ct. 1678; 14 L. Ed. 2d 510; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2282

March 29, 1965, Argued
June 7, 1965, Decided

CASE SUMMARY

adjectival POSTURE: Defendants, a director of health check clinic and a doctor, challenged a decision from the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut, which convicted them of violating a state rightfulness that prohibited the dispensing or use of birth control devices to or by married couples.|

OVERVIEW: Defendants appealed from their convictions under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-32 (rev. 1958) as accessories. They contended that the application of the accessory statute, which was Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-196 (rev. 1958), violated the Fourteenth Amendment. The appellate court affirmed their convictions, as did the state supreme court. On further appeal, the Court offshoot held that as accessories, defendants had standing to challenge the substantive law and to generate along the constitutional rights of the married people with whom they had a professional relationship.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.

In examining the United States Constitution, the Court instal a right of solitude implicit in the Third Amendments prohibition against the quartering of soldiers, the one-fourth Amendments right of people to be secure in their persons, the one-fifth Amendments right against self-incrimination, and the Ninth Amendments right to retain rights not enumerated in the Constitution. The right of privacy to use birth control measures was found to be a legitimate one. Thus, the Court concluded that Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-32 (rev. 1958) was unconstitutional.|

SYLLABUS
Appellants, the executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, and its medical director, a licensed physician, were convicted as accessories for giving married persons information and medical advice on how to prevent conception and, following examination, prescribing a prophylactic device device or material for the wifes use. A Connecticut...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .

No comments:

Post a Comment